About
Relative Gravity Labs began as an inconvenient question three researchers couldn’t stop asking each other: why did local gravitational-wave detector noise seem to spike, disproportionately often, within hours of publicly reported UAP sightings nearby?
We are not a debunking outfit, and we are not a believers’ club. We are a working research group that treats every anomaly as a physics problem first — something to be measured, modeled, and either explained or formally logged as unexplained. Most of what we log turns out to be instrument noise, weather, or conventional aircraft. A small, stubborn fraction doesn’t.
Our name is a small joke and a mission statement at once: gravity is relative to the observer, and it turns out, so is certainty.
Principles
Data before doctrine
We publish raw sensor logs alongside our conclusions. If our model is wrong, the data should be the thing that proves it.
Reproducible or it didn't happen
Every anomaly we log is cross-referenced across at least two independent detector sites before it enters our archive.
No conclusions for sale
We take no defense, aerospace, or government funding. Our findings answer to peer review, not a client.
How we got here
Founded from a shared hunch
Three researchers from gravitational astronomy, propulsion engineering, and signal analysis backgrounds pooled their weekends to compare notes on a pattern none of them could explain alone.
First detector array
Our first low-cost gravitational strain sensors went live, correlating local readings against public observatory data for the first time.
Project Tesseract begins
We started formally modeling propulsion signatures from cross-referenced sighting reports, treating each as a physics problem rather than a mystery.
Three sites, one archive
Today our detector network spans three sites feeding a shared, openly-documented anomaly archive — with more researchers joining the review board every quarter.