Project Tesseract treats reported UAP sightings as a physics problem rather than a mystery. We take public sighting reports — witness accounts, radar-adjacent data, occasional video — and reconstruct implied flight profiles: apparent velocity, acceleration, and turn radius.
The model
For a subset of well-documented cases, the implied accelerations exceed what any known reaction-mass propulsion system could survive, let alone what a human occupant could withstand under conventional inertia. That leaves two possibilities: the reports are wrong, or the underlying physics isn’t conventional inertia at all.
Tesseract’s working hypothesis is the second option — specifically, that some events may involve localized modification of inertial mass rather than brute-force thrust. We are not claiming to have found this. We are building the model rigorous enough to test it against Project Horizon’s detector data.
Current status
Forty-one cases have passed our documentation threshold for formal modeling. Cross-referencing against Horizon strain events is ongoing.